Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 July 2011

How to say sorry in business

My interest in human behaviour and the effect it has on business means that the News International story becomes more compelling by the minute.

First we have the scandal, the shock and the disgust at the bribing of police and the multiple hacking of phones of vulnerable individuals. Then we have the denials, the admissions, the closure of a major newspaper and the potential involvement of families of 9/11 victims. This transatlantic dimension was probably the tipping point for the Murdoch empire as Rupert Murdoch accepted Rebekah Brooks’ resignation and hired a major PR firm for belated damage limitation.

Hence the start of ‘the apology phase’. This weekend, Rupert Murdoch placed advertisements in major newspapers ‘apologising for the serious wrongdoing’

We are sorry.

The News of the World was in the business of holding others to account. It failed when it came to itself.

We are sorry for the serious wrongdoing that occurred.

We are deeply sorry for the hurt suffered by the individuals affected.

We regret not acting faster to sort things out.

I realise that simply apologising is not enough.

Our business was founded on the idea that a free and open press should be a positive force in society. We need to live up to this.

In the coming days, as we take further concrete steps to resolve these issues and make amends for the damage they have caused, you will hear more from us.

Sincerely
Rupert Murdoch.

(published in the Times Newspaper, and other publications 16th July 2011)

But how genuine and how effective is this apology? As Poirot, Sherlock Holmes or maybe even the later great Columbo may say – let us examine the evidence…

Speed of apology:
Stephen R Covey in the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People says that to ensure personal integrity you should apologise quickly and sincerely. The story of the hacking of the phone of murder victim Millie Dowler broke on 4th July. Twelve days ago

Depth of apology:
Covey also refers to an Eastern saying – ‘if you are going to bow, bow low’. I’m not convinced that seven lines is the equivalent of a low bow.

Language used:
In Peter Collett’s fascinating ‘The Book of Tells’, the author outlines how much you can tell regarding someone’s sincerity from their choice of words. Any ownership of the situation and truth in meaning should include personal attachment – i.e. the magic word ‘I’. This demonstrates that the speaker or writer genuinely feels the sentiment expressed. The heading for the apology advertisements was ‘WE are sorry’. Of the 7 lines in these statements, only one contained the word ‘I’ as in ‘I realise that simply apologising is not enough’. Yep, Rupert, we guessed that you realised that when you closed the paper and sacked the editor (sorry – let her go). No personal ownership with any of the other statements though?

Taking the rap (or not):
In the ‘Rules of Management’, Richard templar states that the good manager will always take the rap. Mmm – I still can’t see any evidence of any personal ‘rap-taking’

The perfect apology format:
In business, quick apologies and direct action to rectify mistakes can actually have a beneficial impact on the client relationship. To be fair to News International and their PR advisers, this was always going to be an uphill struggle. But how should you formulate an effective apology strategy?
·         Give a clear overview of the situation and circumstances
·         Acknowledge the damage caused
·         Take responsibility for the issues
·         Express genuine regret and seek forgiveness
·         Offer recompense if appropriate
·         Outline the actions planned to rectify the problem
·         Give reassurance that there will be no repeat of the issue and outline the plans to ensure this

Murdoch’s PR people - take note.

Monday, 20 June 2011

View from an inpatient bed (3): The one about communication

‘The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.’
George Bernard Shaw

One of the few things that Andrew Lansley has admitted he got wrong so far is that he failed to communicate properly how the NHS reforms outlined in the Health and Social Care Bill could actually work. The ‘listening exercise’ that led to the planned changes to the reforms has at least allowed for the drafting of this Bill to include two way communication.

Despite all the talk of NHS cuts and lack of resources, which is undoubtedly having a major impact nationally, I received excellent care as an inpatient for a few days a couple of weeks ago. But during my stay the most significant shortage that I experienced was that most precious of commodities – communication.  Communication is quite simply at the heart of everything we do and is probably the single most important tool in healthcare service improvement.

I witnessed shortcomings at every level. Failure of communication between peers, failure ‘up and down’ the medical hierarchy. Failure in communication with patients, relatives and visitors. Everyone working in their own bubble under the illusion that they were communicating effectively.

Nurse to patient: I arrived on the ward just before midnight and in hushed tones a very charming nurse explained to me in the dimly lit bay that there were ‘many forms’ to be completed before I could retire for the night. I completed one questionnaire and he left the ward, soon to return with another. After two fairly basic but faintly ridiculous questionnaires (was I living in wardened accommodation? Could I dress myself – I promise you, dear reader, I am not quite in my dotage yet), he disappeared into the night again and I waited, presuming another form was coming my way. I waited and I waited. Eventually – I got up and went to the nurses station where he was chatting with his colleagues. ‘Can I go to bed now?’ I asked plaintively and he nodded in surprise. Alas, I didn’t have my crystal ball with me that night and how nice it would have been for him to communicate with me that he had finished his questions.

Patient to nurse: Maybe it would be a good idea to explain to patients what to expect from the nursing and healthcare assistant team. The lady in the bed next to me had unfortunately broken both arms so needed help with the most basic of care, which on the whole she received to a high standard. But she didn’t know if she was supposed to press the call button when she wanted to get dressed or undressed or whether she was supposed to wait until someone offered to do it for her. This caused her some concern every morning and evening as she simply didn’t know how she was supposed to communicate with the nursing team.

Nurse to nurse: The handover rounds were appalling – a senior nurse mumbling to the amassed audience, imparting useless information. There clearly hadn’t been an ‘offline’ handover either. The little old lady – I’ll call her Molly-  in the bed opposite me (I was the only one in the bay born before the 2nd World War!) suffered from what I call happy dementia. She had no idea what was going on but was perfectly content in her own little world. She called me Dot for my entire stay and I was happy to comply. It was getting late one evening and Molly wanted to get back into her bed for the night. But she had no nightdress so put her dressing gown over her clothes and clambered in – at which point I toddled off to the nurses station (interfering? Moi?) to ask a nurse to bring a hospital gown and help Molly get ready for bed. The nurse happily complied, but had no idea that Molly was incapable of looking after herself. Surely this should be part of the handover process?

Doctor to nurse: The nurses changing beds one morning spent quite a bit of time complaining about how poorly the doctors communicated with them. They were, of course, breaking the golden rule of any service industry (and let’s face it – healthcare is the ultimate in service delivery). The golden rule? Don’t whinge about or undermine your colleagues, boss or organisation in front of your clients. Yes – the patients are clients. Often fragile, vulnerable clients. I was desperate to tell them that they were just as guilty of poor communication by not voicing their concerns to the doctors in question but as these nurses were in charge of needles and I was the recipient of many such needles during my stay, I felt it was wise to keep quiet.

Nurse to doctor: Still on the subject of doctor/nurse communication – every evening my 6 pm dose of IV medication was late – up to an hour and a half late. When I queried this, a very agitated sister pointed out to me that it was impossible to give a 6pm IV dose to everyone who needed one at 6pm and the doctors shouldn’t write patients up for a 6pm dose. Have you discussed this with the medical teams I asked? I was sure there was a simple solution. Surely this is something you discuss at the MDT meeting? (multidisciplinary team meeting). For months the ward had been struggling to meet a 6pm deadline which clashed with the normal drugs round, supper, dealing with visitors etc, and no-one had raised this issue with the doctors.

General communication skills: Oh how I would love to spend just an hour training the ward staff in communication. For the staff from overseas, I would make sure they knew how to phrase the most basic questions in colloquial English. One doctor caused great confusion by asking one of my fellow inmates where she was before she came into hospital. Of course the patient replied with details of exactly where she was when she had her accident – on the bowling green – (who would have thought that bowls was such a dangerous sport). This became a saga as the questioning continued – where was she staying? Did she live at the bowling green? Was she in a residential home? In the end, the patient finally understood – the question should have been ‘where do you live?’

I would teach the staff how to address patients – if you are doing the ward round – you acknowledge the patient. Whatever you do – do NOT talk about them as thought they are invisible. I would teach listening skills and how to get your point across in a non confrontational way. Communication with peers is even more important than communication with the patient in many cases.

The only way to achieved integrated care is through clear communication. If just one part of the pathway, i.e. the inpatient stay, is fraught with difficulties, you can multiply that manifold when you also consider primary care, community care, therapy teams, and social care.

Maybe the key is to ensure that the regular MDT meetings follow strict guidelines so that all key points are covered. Maybe the new clinical commissioning teams will include clear and measurable communication as part of the required standards. Whatever happens with the reform plans, communication at all levels is a vital part of the service improvement process.