Reality is
really beginning to bite for a GP who has been a huge supporter of NHS Reform, which
transfers the shift of power to give GPs the majority of the NHS budget to
commission care and services. Dr Dixon has been a bullish proponent of GP led
commissioning and last year relished the new powers to be endowed on GPs, but his
ardour now appears to be waning. What a difference a year makes. Less than a
year even. Last May, I attended an NHS Futures Forum and struggled with Dr
Dixon’s enthusiasm for this shift in power. An extract of my blog that week
follows:
May 18th 2012
‘…..Oh dear oh dear oh dear. I must be very careful how I put
this but Dr Dixon’s presentation fuelled my worst fears about the effect of
these NHS Reforms. He started his talk with ‘I am an independent contractor,
like a plumber’. ….…..Michael is massively in favour of GP Commissioning and
leads a pathfinder GP practice. He was in my opinion (I must be careful not to
upset my lawyers) positively salivating at the prospect of complete control of
a big chunk of the NHS budget. I found his talk of a café in his practice, his
views on specialist representation and his apparent lack of empathy with
secondary care quite worrying……He made no secret of the fact that a desired
outcome of the reform and GP led commissioning was to migrate services away
from Hospital Trusts. He continued – and I quote, as near as my notes allow,
‘I’ll be moving stuff from hospital to my practice and I’ll get money for it,
therefore there needs to be total transparency’. Baroness Young (the chair of the event) was
brilliant as a devil’s advocate with her careful wording. She asked Dr Dixon
his view on the fact that many patients, especially those with long term
conditions do not wish to be ‘discharged’ from the care of their specialists to
be handed over to a general practitioner……I asked Dr Dixon if perhaps that
figure [that 30 -40% hospital admissions are avoidable] could be due to the fact
that patients couldn’t get in to see their GP and how would GP commissioning
improve this state of affairs. For a moment I thought he had morphed into
Andrew Lansley as the question was effectively side stepped. When I queried the
impression that he didn’t want specialists on ‘his’ commissioning board, he
clarified that he doesn’t want hospital specialists on the board who are
‘trying to protect their budget’. A
phrase that springs to mind includes ‘pot and ‘kettle black…….’
Back
to the present…
There
is some merit in Dr Dixon’s demand that the wording of section 75 of the Health
and Social Care Act should be changed as it appears to encourage a scatter gun
approach to opening up competition for services which could be unsuitable for
private involvement either due to expertise, location or supply issues. Commissioning
isn’t easy. If it was, the NHS would be in a better state than it is. I would
much prefer seeing GPs looking after patients, directing their care and referring
them on to appropriate specialist services. But the nitty gritty of preparing
tenders, assessing responses and monitoring contracts is a full time job.
I
believe that carefully managed competition in targeted service areas can be a
good thing for the NHS. But commissioning is a specialised, time consuming,
detailed and burdensome job. Being a GP is a specialised, time consuming,
detailed and burdensome job. How can GPs realistically be good at both? Dr
Dixon continued in his interview with Pulse magazine that offering the
tendering process for most NHS services to private firms could mean that the
reforms are ‘a complete waste of time’ and that ‘GPs will walk’.
Last
year, referring to his desire for autonomy and lack of interference, Dr Dixon famously
said ‘GP’s don’t want to be managed – we
want to be seduced’
Fun
as seduction may be, it often results in consequences that aren’t always
positive. I am tempted to say ‘I told you so’.
Instead
I shall settle for ‘Be careful what you wish for….’
0 comments:
Post a Comment