But
this weekend I salute the Australian government and their health ministry in
sticking to their guns with their anti-smoking strategy. Australia is the first
country to make it compulsory, by law, to sell cigarettes in plain packaging. Except
it’s not actually plain packaging – the lethal drugs are now being sold in
packs emblazoned with gory pictures representing the various diseases caused by
smoking. A supermarket’s cigarette cabinet down under now looks like the horror
section of a DVD rental store. Manufacturers have no choice but to place these
graphic images on their merchandise and they have no choice of colour for their
packs either – they must be green. The only nod to brand is the ‘brand variant’
being listed in small print at the bottom of the front of the pack.
Will
this work and should a country seek to restrict industry in this way? In my opinion
the answer to both is yes.
The
tobacco industry is vehemently against this initiative, saying that it won’t work
and will increase tobacco smuggling, forcing them to decrease their prices in
order to be more competitive, hence leading to increased smoking. Mmm – a rather
tenuous argument methinks. Of course they are against this move because it is bound
to have a detrimental effect on the glamour associated with smoking by the
young. Maybe there is an odd approach to smoking in Australia. My step daughter
has told me how surprised she is that many of her peers, mainly young(ish)
housewives smoke – usually in secret – to the extent that they wear rubber
gloves when they nip outside for a quick fag so there will be no tell-tale
marks on their fingers – bizarre!
I suspect
that the immortal youth who already smoke will mentally distance themselves
from the upsetting images on the packs, believing that such health nightmares
could not happen to them. But maybe the horror pics will stop the next
generation from starting in the first place – it’s got to be worth a try.
The
pictures on packs in the UK do have some effect – a young friend of mine who
used to smoke said he was tempted to ask for a pack not by brand but instead he
would try to pick the pack with the least upsetting picture! I wonder in the
future whether Australian smokers will ask for ‘the pack with the rotting teeth
and ulcerated mouth’ rather than ‘the one showing a young women in an oxygen
mask’.
It
will be very, very interesting to see if this bold move makes any difference in
the number of cigarette packs sold in Australia, and hopefully a long term
study will prove that this has gone some way in reducing the number of smokers
in the next generation. If this does work, and Australia reach the targeted reduction
in smokers from 16% of the population in 2007 to less than 10% by 2018, then
here in the UK we should take note of hard evidence and follow their lead.
And
to the pro-smoking lobby and accusers of a ‘nanny state’ regime I have one
thing to say – carry on smoking if you must, but don’t expect anyone to make it
easy for your peers, or more importantly your children, to take up this lethal
habit.
1 comments:
Hmmm....as an enjoyer of the very occasional small cigar(!), I'm not sure where I stand on this. Instinctively, I'm against the "nanny state" regime because for me, that's not what Government should be about. Plus such interventions usually have the opposite effect because people don't like having their lives micro-managed in this way.
That said, our pubs, public transport and public places are much more enjoyable for the smoking ban.
Ultimately, I don't see this happening here. The smuggling angle (and the resources it will take to police) will be a real concern and I also think that the tobacco industry must have a fairly solid case on the application of EU Competition Law (which is supposed to curb anti-competitive behaviours by Member States, not encourage them!).
Post a Comment